Prosody Pup
A gentle guide for learning stress, rhythm, and fluent reading — one step at a time.
Reading may look silent, but the mind often gives it a voice.
Let’s listen a little closer.
EL·e·phant
rhi·NOC·er·os
hip·po·POT·a·mus
kan·ga·ROO
In many words, one syllable carries the strongest beat.
PHO·to·graph
pho·TOG·ra·phy
pho·to·GRAPH·ic
Even related words can carry the beat in different places.
The hungry hippo splashed in the pool.
The HUN·gry HIP·po SPLASHED in the POOL.
Across a sentence, the beats form a pattern.
the BAND will PLAY to·NIGHT at SCHOOL
ta-DUM · ta-DUM · ta-DUM · ta-DUM
A lighter syllable can lead into a strong beat.
DRA·ma STU·dents PRAC·ticed LOUD·ly
DUM-ta · DUM-ta · DUM-ta · DUM-ta
A strong beat can also come first.
Sentences can have different beat patterns.
Let’s eat Grandma.
Let’s eat │ Grandma.
Let’s eat, Grandma.
Grouping can change meaning — even in silent reading.
Listen to each one.
Same word. Different voice.
Punctuation gives readers clues about how it might sound.
The same word, really, spoken three ways — settling like a statement, rising like a question, and jumping with surprise.
Meaning
Intonation
Phrasing
Rhythm
Stress
Words
Together, stress, rhythm, phrasing, and intonation help readers turn print into a voice—and a voice into meaning.
An interactive laboratory where people discover how the mind brings written language to life.
I’ve been listening all along.
Now you can hear it too.
— Sputnik, the Prosody Pup
1 of 9
Not aloud, but in the mind. Prosody Trainer makes that inner voice visible.
Prosody Trainer is a growing suite of research-based tools for exploring how written language carries stress, rhythm, phrasing, and intonation.
A simple interface for visualizing stress and rhythm in English text.
Advanced analysis, phrase structure, rhythm detection, editing, and export.
A gentle guide for learning stress, rhythm, and fluent reading — one step at a time.
An interactive game for discovering how intonation changes meaning during reading.
When people read silently, they often construct an inner voice carrying patterns of stress, rhythm, phrasing, and intonation. These patterns help readers group words, anticipate sentence structure, resolve ambiguity, and retain meaning.
Prosody Trainer turns this normally hidden structure into something readers can see, explore, and practice.
Prosody helps readers organize language into meaningful units, distinguish emphasis, and understand how words and phrases fit together.
Our research asks how readers represent prosody, how these processes differ across readers, and whether prosodic sensitivity can be strengthened through instruction.
Prosody Trainer’s stress and rhythm models draw on the metrical and prosodic-phonology tradition.
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. Harper & Row.
Martin, J. G. (1972). Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior. Psychological Review, 79(6), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033467
Halle, M. (1973). Stress rules in English: A new version. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(4), 451–464.
Liberman, M. (1975). The intonational system of English [Doctoral dissertation, MIT]. (Distributed 1978 by Indiana University Linguistics Club.)
Liberman, M., & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(2), 249–336.
Ladd, D. R. (1980). The structure of intonational meaning: Evidence from English. Indiana University Press.
Hayes, B. (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules [Doctoral dissertation, MIT]. (Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.)
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1982). Prosodic domains of external sandhi rules. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (Part I) (pp. 225–255). Foris.
Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. MIT Press.
Beckman, M. E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Foris.
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Foris.
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. University of Chicago Press.
Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press.
The project supports classroom demonstration, reading intervention, psycholinguistic research, and public understanding of the cognitive science of reading.
Plain-language introductions to stress, rhythm, phrasing, intonation, and implicit prosody.
Digital tools for examining how readers represent and use prosodic information in written language.
Demonstrations, sample activities, and guided lessons for helping learners notice the prosody of written language.
Prosody Trainer grows from a program of research on the inner voice of reading and on ways to make stress and rhythm more visible in print.
Gross, J., Roldan, M., Kiessel, T., Esselink, M., & Dunlap, L. (2026). Reading and Writing.
Two experiments examining whether visible stress and rhythm cues strengthen readers’ sensitivity to prosody.
View publication →Gross, J., Winegard, B., & Plotkowski, A. R. (2018). Reading Research Quarterly.
An experimental study of how visible lexical stress cues influence the rhythm readers construct during silent reading.
View publication →Gross, J., Millett, A. L., Bartek, B., Bredell, K. H., & Winegard, B. (2014). Reading Research Quarterly, 49(2), 189–208.
Evidence that readers represent prosodic structure while processing written language.
View publication →See additional publications on Jennifer Gross’s university profile →
Prosody Trainer was created by Jennifer Gross, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology at Grand Valley State University. Her research examines how readers represent the sound structure of written language and whether stress and rhythm can be made more visible through instruction and digital tools.
Developed at the intersection of cognitive psychology, psycholinguistics, literacy research, and educational technology, the project supports classroom demonstration, reading research, and the development of evidence-based interventions.
University profile grossj@gvsu.edu